International Journal of Telecommunications & Emerging Technologies
Edge Resource Allocation for Different IoT based Smart Devices in Real-Time Applications Processing
Abstract
Empowered by figuring resources at the network edge, data recognized from IoT contraptions can be taken care of and set aside in their nearby cloudlets to decrease the traffic load in the middle network, while various IoT applications can be run in cloudlets to reduce the response time between IoT clients (e.g., client gear in versatile networks) and cloudlets. Considering the spatial and transient components of each and every application's positions among cloudlets, the obligation appropriation among cloudlets for each IoT application impacts the response time of the application's requestinging. The cloud-based IoT gadgets frequently neglect to accomplish the developing cases of their end client clients, especially with respect to the conveyance of ongoing administrations and excellent excellence of involvement, keeping the protection and security of the incorporated framework. This has provoked IoT associations that send data managing errands at the edge of the IT network, giving rising to IoT plans considering edge handling. In this arrangement, both the network deferral and figuring delay are thought of, i.e., IoT clients' requesting are more plausible designated to ever closer stacked cloudlets. Meanwhile, the arrangement will logically change enlisting resources of different applications in each cloudlet considering their positions, thusly diminishing the figuring deferral of all requesting in the cloudlet. The presentation of the proposed plot has been endorsed by wide reenactments.References (33)
- Tong T, Li G, Liu X, Gao Q. Image super-resolution using dense skip connections. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2017 (pp.; 4799-–4807).
- Fan CL, Lo WC, Pai YT, Hsu CH. A survey on 360 video streaming: Acquisition, transmission, and display. ACM Computing Surveys (Csur). 2019 Aug 30; 52(4): 1–-36.
- Fan Q, Ansari N, Sun X. Energy driven avatar migration in green cloudlet networks. IEEE Communications Letters. 2017 Mar 20; 21(7): 1601–-4.
- Chiang, M.; , Ha, S.; , Risso, F.; , Zhang, T.; , Chih-Lin, I. Clarifying Fog Computing and Networking: 10 Questions and Answers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, ; 55(4), : 18–20.
- Yousefpour A, Fung C, Nguyen T, Kadiyala K, Jalali F, Niakanlahiji A, Kong J, Jue JP. All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey. Journal of Systems Architecture. 2019 Sep 1; 98: 289–-330.
- Zhang C. Design and application of fog computing and Internet of Things service platform for smart city. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2020 Nov 1; 112: 630–-40.
- Fan CL, Lo WC, Pai YT, Hsu CH. A survey on 360 video streaming: Acquisition, transmission, and display. Acm Computing Surveys (Csur). 2019 Aug 30;52(4):1-36.
- Čolaković, A., Hadžialić, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues. Comput. Netw. 2018; 144, : 17–39 (2018).
- doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017
- Nguyen, B.M., Thi Thanh Binh, H., Do Son, B.: Evolutionary algorithms to optimize task scheduling problem for the IoT based bag-of-tasks application in cloud–fog computing environment. Appl Sci. 2019; 9(9), ): 1730 (2019). doi:10.3390/app9091730
- Abohamama, A.S., Alrahmawy, M.F., Elsoud, M.A.: Improving the dependability of cloud environment for hosting real time applications. AIN Shams Eng. J. 2018; 9(4), ): 3335–3346 (2018).
- doi:10.1016/j.asej.2017.11.006
- Pham, X.Q., Man, N.D., Tri, N.D.T., Thai, N.Q., Huh, E.N.: A cost-and performance-effective approach for task scheduling based on collaboration between cloud and fog computing. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (2017; 13(11):155014771774207). doi:10.1177/1550147717742073
- Li, G., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Lin, D., Zhao, S.: Methods of resource scheduling based on optimized fuzzy clustering in fog computing. Sensors. ( 2019; 19(9): 2122). doi:10.3390/s19092122
- Mukherjee, M., Shu, L., Wang, D.: Survey of fog computing: Fundamental, network applications, and research challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018; 20(3), ): 1826–1857 (2018).
- doi:10.1109/COMST.2018.2814571
- Liu, L., Qi, D., Zhou, N., Wu, Y.: A task scheduling algorithm based on classification mining in fog computing environment. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. (2018; 2018: 2102348).
- doi:10.1155/2018/2102348
- Mahmoud, M.M., Rodrigues, J.J., Saleem, K., Al-Muhtadi, J., Kumar, N., Korotaev, V.: Towards energy-aware fog-enabled cloud of things for healthcare. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2018; 67, : 58–69 (2018).
- doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.02.047
- Binh, H.T.T., Anh, T.T., Son, D.B., Duc, P.A., Nguyen, B.M.: An evolutionary algorithm for solving task scheduling problem in cloud-fog computing environment. In: Proc of the Ninth 9th Int Symp on Inf and Commun Technol (pp. 397–404), Danang City (. 2018). ; 397–404. doi:10.1145/3287921
- Mishra, S.K., Puthal, D., Rodrigues, J.J., Sahoo, B., Dutkiewicz, E.: Sustainable service allocation using a metaheuristic technique in a fog server for industrial applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018; 14(10), ): 4497–4506 (2018). doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2791619
- Ghobaei-Arani, M., Souri, A., Safara, F., Norouzi, M.: An efficient task scheduling approach using moth-flame optimization algorithm for cyber-physical system applications in fog computing. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. (2020; 31(2): e3770). doi:10.1002/ett.3770
- Abohamama, A.S., Hamouda, E.: A hybrid energy: aware virtual machine placement algorithm for cloud environments. Expert Syst. Appl. (2020; 150: 113306). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113306
- Kimpan, W., Kruekaew, B.: Heuristic task scheduling with artificial bee colony algorithm for virtual machines. In: Joint 8th Int Conf on Soft Comput and Intell Syst (SCIS) and 17th Int Symp on Adv Intell Syst (pp. 281–286), Hokkaido. (2016). ; 281–286. doi:10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2016.0067
- Abdullahi, M., Ngadi, M.A.: Symbiotic Organism Search optimization based task scheduling in cloud computing environment. Fut. ure Gener. Comput. Syst. 2016; 56, : 640–650 (2016).
- doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.08.006
- Mishra, S.K., Sahoo, B., Manikyam, P.S.: Adaptive scheduling of cloud tasks using ant colony optimization. In: Proc of the 3rd Int Conf on Commun and Inf Process (pp. 202–208) (2017). ; 202–208.
- doi:10.1145/3162957.3163032
- Gill, S.S., Buyya, R., Chana, I., Singh, M., Abraham, A.: BULLET: particle swarm optimization based scheduling technique for provisioned cloud resources. J. Netw. Syst. Manag. 2018; 26(2), ): 361–400 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10922-017-9419-y
- Reddy, G.N., Kumar, S.P.: Modified ant colony optimization algorithm for task scheduling in cloud computing systems. In: Smart Intell Computing and Appl (pp. Singapore: Springer.; 2019; 357–365) (2019). . Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1921-1_36
- Natesan, G., Chokkalingam, A.: Task scheduling in heterogeneous cloud environment using mean grey wolf optimization algorithm. ICT Express. 2019; 5(2), ): 110–114 (2019).
- doi:10.1016/j.icte.2018.07.002