International Journal of Embedded Systems and Emerging Technologies

A Proposed Model for Cloud Security Controlled by CS Using Reactive Programming

  1. Rakesh Bhavsar ✉
  2. Kripal Sanjay Zala
  3. Shubham Nagar

Abstract

Security in the Cloud In our suggested approach, the popular reactive programming paradigm has been used as a novel solution. In this research, we evaluate and minimise the execution time for the model proposed in cloud security, where security control is delegated to the CS(Cloud expert) of a certain company based on predetermined alternatives. The synchronisation of concurrent operations as well as the manipulation of real-time We faced some data challenges in our previous work using traditional programming. This study gives solutions for two programming approaches based on the optimal solutions of the given model. for cloud security, using traditional programming as the first way and reactive programming as the most appropriate answer in our circumstance. We employed identical procedures to take the measurements in this article, and we compare the results of the first and second programming methods. The paper's findings are provided in tables and graphs, demonstrating that reactive programming in the suggested cloud security paradigm produces better outcomes than conventional programming

References (88)

  1. Hyseni, D.; Luma, A.; Selimi, B.; Cico, B. The Proposed Model to Increase Security of Sensitive
  2. Data in Cloud Computing. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2018, 9, pp203–210.
  3. Mogk, R.; Salvaneschi, G.; Mezini, M. Reactive programming experience with rescaling. In
  4. Proceedings of the Conference Companion of the 2nd International Conference on Art,Science, and
  5. Engineering of Programming, Nice, France, 9–12 April 2018; pp. 105–112.
  6. Ignatoff, D.; Cooper, G.H.; Krishnamurthi, S. Crossing state lines: Adapting object-oriented
  7. frameworks to functional reactive languages. In International Symposium on Functional and Logic
  8. Programming; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 259–276.
  9. Cunha, G.T. Reactive vs. Synchronous Performance Test with Spring Boot 2.0. 2018. Available
  10. online: dzone.com/articles/spring- boot-20-web flux-reactive-performance-test (accessed on 12
  11. Programming Paradigms Available from [online]:
  12. https://theailearner.com/2018/09/26/programming-paradigms
  13. Staltz, A. The Introduction to Reactive Programming You’ve Been Missing. 2014. Available
  14. online: https://gist.github.com/ staltz/868e7e9bc2a7b8c1f754 (accessed on 21 August 2017).
  15. Doglio, F. Functional Reactive Programming. In Reactive Programming with Node; Apress:
  16. Berkeley, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 25–45.
  17. Liberty, J.; Betts, P.; Turalski, S. Programming Reactive Extensions and Linq; Apress Media, LLC:
  18. New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  19. Bonér, J.; Klang, V. Reactive Programming vs. Reactive Systems; Lightbend, Inc.: San
  20. Francisco, CA, USA, 2016.
  21. A Proposed Model for Cloud Security Controlled by CS UsingReactive Programming Bhavsar et al.
  22. Salvaneschi, G.; Margara, A.; Tamburrelli, G. Reactive programming: A walkthrough. In
  23. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering,
  24. Florence, Italy, 16–24 May 2015; Volume 2, pp. 953–954.
  25. Czaplicki, E.; Chong, S. Asynchronous functional reactive programming for GUIs. ACM
  26. SIGPLAN Not. 2013, 48, 411–422. [CrossRef]
  27. Hyseni, D.; Cico, B.; Shabani, I. The proposed model for security in the cloud is controlledby the
  28. end-user. In Proceedings of the 2015 4th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing
  29. (MECO), Budva, Montenegro, 14–18 June 2015; pp. 81–84.
  30. Hyseni, D.; Cico, B.; Luma, A.; Selimi, B.; Shemsedini, E. Different methods of distribution data
  31. in the cloud—Controlled by IT security specialist. In Proceedings of the 2018 7th Mediterranean
  32. Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), Budva, Montenegro,10–14 June 2018; pp. 1–5.
  33. Hyseni, D.; Selimi, B.; Luma, A.; Cico, B. The strategy of cryptography for the proposed model of
  34. security in cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Power,
  35. Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI), Chennai, India, 21–22 September
  36. Hussain, M.E.; Hussain, R. Cloud Security as a Service Using Data Loss Prevention: Challenges
  37. and Solution. In International Conference on Internet of Things and Connected Technologies;
  38. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 98–106.
  39. Mishra, S.; Sharma, S.K.; Alowaidi, M.A. Analysis of security issues of cloud-based web
  40. applications. J. Ambient. Intell. Humanize. Comput. 2021, 12, 7051–7062. [CrossRef]
  41. Juels, A.; Kaliski, B.S., Jr. Pors: Proofs of retrievability for large files. In Proceedings of the 2007
  42. ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2007), Alexandria, VA, USA,
  43. November–31 October 2007; ACM Digital Library: New York, NY,USA, 2007; pp. 584–597.
  44. Sen, J. Security and privacy issues in cloud computing. In Architectures and Protocols forSecure
  45. Information Technology Infrastructures; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 1–45.
  46. Santos, N.; Gummadi, K.P.; Rodrigues, R. Towards Trusted Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of
  47. the 2009 Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HOT CLOUD), San Diego, CA, USA,
  48. June 2009; USENIX: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009.
  49. Garfinkel, T.; Pfaff, B.; Chow, J.; Rosenblum, M.; Boneh, D. Terra: A virtual machine-based
  50. platform for trusted computing. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating
  51. Systems Principles, Bolton Landing, NY, USA, 19–22 October 2003.
  52. Ponemon Institute Research Report. Global Encryption Trends Study. 2021. Available
  53. online:https://www.entrust.com/-/media/documentation/reports/2021-global-encryption-trendsexec-summary-re.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2022).
  54. Krautheim, F.J. Private Virtual Infrastructure for Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of the 2009
  55. Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, HotCloud 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, 15 June
  56. Kumar, S.; Karnani, G.; Gaur, M.S.; Mishra, A. Cloud security using hybrid cryptography
  57. algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and
  58. Management (ICIEM), London, UK, 28–30 April 2021; pp. 599–604.
  59. Dhirani, L.L.; Newe, T.; Nizamani, S. Federated Hybrid Clouds Service Level Agreements and
  60. Legal Issues. In Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology;
  61. Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 471–486.
  62. Ouedraogo, M.; Mignon, S.; Cholez, H.; Furnell, S.; Dubois, E. Security transparency: The next
  63. frontier for security research in the cloud. J. Cloud Comput. 2015, 4, 12. [CrossRef]
  64. Arshad, J.; Townend, P.; Jie, X. Quantification of Security for Compute Intensive Workloads in
  65. Clouds. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems,
  66. Shenzhen, China, 8–11 December 2009.
  67. De Chaves, S.A.; Uriarte, R.B.; Westphall, C.B. Towards an architecture for monitoring private
  68. clouds. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 130–137. [CrossRef]
  69. Sangui, S.; Ghosh, S.K. Cloud Security Using Honeypot Network and Blockchain: A Review. In
  70. Machine Learning Techniques and Analytics for Cloud Security; Scrivener Publishing LLC:
  71. Beverly, MA, USA, 2021.
  72. International Journal of Embedded Systems and Emerging Technologies
  73. Jaatun, M.G.; Zhao, G.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Nyre, Å.A.; Alapnes, S.; Tang, Y. The design of a
  74. redundant array of independent net storage for improved confidentiality in cloud computing. J.
  75. Cloud Comput. Adv. Syst. Appl. 2012, 1, 13. [CrossRef]
  76. Dorairaj, S.D.; Kaliannan, T. An adaptive multilevel security framework for the data stored in a
  77. cloud environment. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 601017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wolters, P.T.J. The security of personal data under the GDPR: A harmonized duty or ashared
  79. responsibility? Int. Data Privacy. Law 2017, 7, 165–178. [CrossRef]
  80. Mosch, M.; Groß, S.; Schill, A. User-controlled resource management in federated clouds. J. Cloud
  81. Comput. 2014, 3, 10. [CrossRef]
  82. Nagarajan, G. Comparative Analysis of Public Cloud Security-Based Schemes and Cryptographic
  83. Algorithms. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. (TURCOMAT) 2021, 12, pp 2114–2127.
  84. Awaysheh, F.M.; Aladwan, M.N.; Alazab, M.; Alawadi, S.; Cabaleiro, J.C.; Pena, T.F. Security by
  85. design for big data frameworks over cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021. [CrossRef]
  86. Bhavsar Rakesh; Prediction and Monitoring on secure edge-cloud integrated privacy-preserving
  87. Heath Protecting system National level Research Journal GIT-JET Journal of Engineering and
  88. Technology ISSN 2249-6157 (vol 13)

Read more of it

Subscribe to one journal or build your own list of several. One invoice, one payment, access for a full year.

Subscribe to journals →

Publish your article

Peer-reviewed journals across every subject, with open access options. Send your manuscript to the right editor today.

Publish with us → Calculate your APC
Support